Re: ATL.2600 are steeling are ObHacks.
Article: 8914 of alt.hackers From: email@example.com (Sean Logan) Newsgroups: alt.hackers Subject: Re: ATL.2600 are steeling are ObHacks. Date: 21 Oct 1995 22:31:47 GMT Organization: Davis Community Network - Davis, California, USA Lines: 32 Approved: firstname.lastname@example.org Message-ID: email@example.com NNTP-Posting-Host: wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Status: RO
Richard Craig (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote: : That's right LOOK: : >In article <email@example.com> David Gerard wrote: : >>Date: 18 Oct 1995 00:55:05 +1000 : >>From: firstname.lastname@example.org (David Gerard) : >>Newsgroups: alt.2600,alt.silly-group.lampreys : >>Subject: AOL password finding : >> : >>Found this on alt.hackers. : >> Hey, that was my ObHack, and not a very good one at that. They're just excited about it because it had to do with AOL. Lamers, all of them. Dang, time for another.. ObHack: Today a message should start being propagated around Usenet that I sent via port 119 to my news server on Wednesday. It's just now going to start propagating because I post-dated it to today. Just a test, really, to see if my suspicion that if you set the Date header to the future, your message will be delayed till then and then sent, is right. I discovered this oddity by accident when I posted a message with Date 1999, wonder if that will ever appear :) ~~~ Sean Logan "There's no 'them' -- it's all us" email@example.com http://wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us/~sean/spam-faq.html