alt.hackers.discuss creation
Article: 8574 of alt.hackers From: gregc@msn.fullfeed.com (Greg Corey) Newsgroups: alt.hackers Subject: alt.hackers.discuss creation Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 17:46:57 GMT Organization: CPU Wizards Lines: 89 Approved: U.S.D.A. Choice -- Here's the beef! Message-ID: 439m92$97m@fullfeed.msn.fullfeed.com NNTP-Posting-Host: cpuw.msn.fullfeed.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Status: RO
Hi folks. Some good news and some better news. A new group, alt.hackers.discuss has been formed. The purpose of this (also self-moderated) group is to provide a more free-flowing forum of ideas without the requirement of an obhack. As it will take a few days for the newsgroup to get propagated, your server may not have it yet. If you would like to speed propagation, there is a note for how you can send a booster newgroup in my OBHack. Suffice to say if you're not REAL comfortable doing so, please don't. It has to be done exactly right or propagation problems WILL occur. I will be ginning up a FAQ for that group in the next couple of days and will present it here for your input. I will continue to encourage the use of alt.hackers to post hacks and comments/questions about hacks. I believe alt.hackers.discuss should focus on the future of hacking and other hacker (as opposed to hack) issues -- IE: the people, not the thing. I am not, however, an all-knowing all-powerful being, and these are just my thoughts. I am very much interested in hearing dissenting thoughts. THIS IS YOUR NEWSGROUP (well, newsgroups now!) so please, if you have a thought, state it. Email is fine if you don't wish to include an OBHack. OBsoyouwanttoconvince100,000sysadminsthatalt.hackers.discussisagoodideaHACK: After alt.hackers had the discussion of alt.hackers.d, I went to alt.config, asked about making it, asked if there were any objections. Turns out that the .d extension is a convention that some sysadmins (I had never heard of this before) use to mean an unmoderated discussion group of it's moderated parent group. IE: alt.foo.bar.d would be the unmoderated discussion group of the moderated group alt.foo.bar. Anyway, after clearing that up (apparently nobody minds .discuss), I finally had to get the syntax right, which was a major pain finding bits and peices of information everywhere. Apparently self-moderation is not something that is real well known about... and even the immortal Jef P. had trouble with it. Someone finally helped me out by sending me Jef P's initial newgroup control message for alt.hackers. Is this a hack? Well, it was a heck of a lot harder than figuring out how to post here, so I'm going to say yes. If you wish to help propagate the group more quickly, you can send a booster newgroup message to your local server. I will explain how to do this, with one warning: PLEASE DON'T DO THIS IF YOU DON'T KNOW EXACTLY HOW TO DO IT! If you issue the newgroup incorrectly, it can cause bad newsgroup propagation. Please follow the example EXACTLY and DON'T DO IT if you're not REAL comfortable with how to do so. Everything within the control message block MUST BE IN YOUR post. The first 4 lines are header lines, not message body lines. All of them must be present or it will not work. *****BEGIN INCLUDED CONTROL MESSAGE***** Newsgroups: alt.config, alt.hackers.discuss Subject: cmsg newgroup alt.hackers.discuss moderated (booster) Approved: Your email address. Should be IDENTICAL to your From: field. Control: newgroup alt.hackers.discuss moderated This newsgroup is self-moderated. It should be marked moderated in the active file, but with no moderator's address in the mailpaths file. If you have some problem with this, please send email to gregc@msn.fullfeed.com. Check the groups alt.hackers and alt.dev.null for examples of self-moderated groups. Group submission address: Moderator contact address: For your newsgroups file: alt.hackers.discuss A self-moderated hackers discussion group alt.hackers.discuss is a self-moderated hackers discussion group. Its purpose is to provide hackers from alt.hackers a place for more free-form discussion without the restriction of an OBHack (see alt.hackers FAQ). The purpose of the self-moderation is to require posters to know how to forge an "Approved:" header. Therefore not be net-spammers or 12 year old "Kuhl rad warez, d00d!" type poster. RFC reaction on alt.hackers was positive with one dissenting vote. Only objection from alt.config was that alt.hackers.d (the originally discussed name) would normally indicate an unmoderated discussion group of the moderated alt.hackers. As a result, the name has been changed to alt.hackers.discuss. Please send information requests to gregc@msn.fullfeed.com *****END INCLUDED CONTROL MESSAGE***** -- Greg Corey | All opinions are my own, no warranty made or gregc@msn.fullfeed.com | implied. Send complaints to god@heaven.org