This article was posted to the Usenet group alt.hackers in
1995; any technical information is probably outdated.
Parent Parent Parent Parent
Re: Sendmail security holes..
Article: 7456 of alt.hackers From: unixer@unix.xite.com (UNIXer) Newsgroups: alt.hackers Subject: Re: Sendmail security holes.. Date: Mon, 27 Feb 95 09:20:43 GMT Organization: the Home of the DC-8 off to Teegeeack Lines: 17 Approved: By Evlis of course! Message-ID: 3is5hb$gng_001@news.gmu.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: osf1.gmu.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #3 Status: RO
In article <3is245$2c6@lll-winken.llnl.gov>, set@oryx.llnl.gov (Sam Trenholme) wrote: >>Generally it means that the xyplex is just overloaded. > >Since you chose to use a bogus address, Just another net.hack! Good ole ports... love em, live em. > I guess I'll just have to make a >fool of myself on the net. What exactly is an "xyplex"? Will a >comp.*.modems FAQ have the answer to this question? A dilaup series of modems, kinda like an old FEP. Basically, a big rack of modems. No foolish questions, the only foolish question is the unanswered question. UNIXer *+* I love the idea that address'es may be a thing of the past. True freedom from persecution, due to unpopular ideas.
Parent Parent Parent Parent